PointCraft Debate

Sign in

Privacy

About PointCraft Debate

We blend the rigor of clinical process design with the creativity of rhetorical craft. Every lesson is a clear step; every drill is a measurable improvement.

Our story

PointCraft Debate began as a weekend workshop for young advocates who struggled to convert research into round-winning speeches. We rebuilt training from the ground up: define observable outcomes, instrument practice, and treat reflection as data—not vibes.

Since then, we’ve supported students and coaches across formats—Policy, Lincoln-Douglas, Parliamentary, and Public Forum—always with transparent rubrics and ethical persuasion front and center.

Explore programs

Mission and values

  • Precision: clear definitions, shared timers, and rubric-aligned feedback.
  • Integrity: citations, fair argumentation, and respect for opponents and judges.
  • Accessibility: multiple formats and scholarships to widen participation.
  • Transfer: skills that translate to classrooms, careers, and civic life.
Read our FAQs

Team

Avery Chen — Head Coach

Former national finalist. Designs curriculum architecture and evaluation rubrics.

Jordan Patel — Research Director

Leads source vetting workflows and evidence modules for all formats.

Riley Thompson — Delivery Coach

Specializes in voice, pacing, and judge adaptation under tight time controls.

Quality assurance

Each cohort is paired with a QA checklist: pre-session objectives, mid-course diagnostics, and endline skill audits. We publish aggregate cohort data so outcomes stay visible and honest.

Terms and policies